Talk:United Learning

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

UCSTULT123 (talk · contribs)

Best in everyone?

Does the Trust use "Best in everyone" as a branding anywhere? There was a duplicate article started about the Trust at Best in everyone; it's currently a redirect here, but I'm inclined to delete it as an unlikely search term. —C.Fred (talk) 17:01, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"very common in england"

This learning trust is very common in england so i think it must be on wikipedia to show effort of this trust on student's life. --Talkshawk (talk) 13:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it's that common, there should be some independent reliable sources that can be cited in the article. Right now, no sources are cited. —C.Fred (talk) 16:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ULT academies section

Update required. The trust has altered. The list of academies is out of date. WP:RS materials must be found to cite the change and an update made. The ULT website shows the change, but is a primary source, though authoritative in these circunstances Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:59, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

There's still too much bumfodder here, quoted directly from the subject's own website. Where are the independent, impartial reliable sources? --Orange Mike | Talk 18:42, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Name change to just United Learning?

The official site brands itself as just United Learning now. Should the article also be moved to United Learning? —C.Fred (talk) 23:49, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that would be correct. They no longer use the trust part anywhere, but I don't know how to change it Matthewm192 (talk) 16:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on United Learning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]