Talk:United Abominations/GA1
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am considering trying to improve this article further, but I am a but unsure about its current GA status (due to it having been listed a long time ago). I have achieved a couple of GA nominations before, but I would much prefer a more experienced editor review the article to determine whether it currently meets the GA criteria. Thanks, --L1A1 FAL (talk) 19:31, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- You are probably looking for either a community assessment or a {{GA request}} instead of an individual reassessment. I can look at it in the form of a GA request if you want. AIRcorn (talk) 08:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, I'm kinda new to the reassessment thing, and I initially wasn't really sure where to take it. If you would check over it that would be great, but if I would do better by taking it to the community reassessment, then that would work, too.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 16:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I completely forgot about this. A quick read through does not reveal anything that suggests it should be delisted. In fact it seems a tidy little article. If you are thinking of featured status your best bet would to be to either ask a relevant wikiproject to look at it or take it to WP:Peer review. I will close this as kept for now at least. AIRcorn (talk) 03:30, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, I'm kinda new to the reassessment thing, and I initially wasn't really sure where to take it. If you would check over it that would be great, but if I would do better by taking it to the community reassessment, then that would work, too.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 16:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)