Talk:Uniform and insignia of the Boy Scouts of America

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Uniform and insignia of the Boy Scouts of America article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

Scouting High‑importance

	Scouting portal Uniform and insignia of the Boy Scouts of America is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This subarticle is kept separate from the main article, Boy Scouts of America, due to size or style considerations.

Picture

Can't anyone find a better picture because the one on now is pretty crapy. RENTASTRAWBERRY ^{FOR LET?} röck 01:10, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to SenorAnderson for a great pic. --Gadget850 17:13, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Explorer Uniform

In the section on History, it currently states: "Explorers had a spruce green uniform, but by the 1970s many posts were developing their own uniform. Eventually only the shirt was available, leading many to wear the shirt with olive green Boy Scout pants or shorts." My comment: I wasn't aware that Explorers EVER had "spruce green" shorts. I thought that the "olive green" Boy Scout shorts were always the officially approved shorts to wear with the spruce green shirt. I joined the BSA in 1960, and then became an Explorer in 1964 (and remained an Explorer into the 1970s). I attended the 1964 Jamboree, Philmont in 1965, and National O.A. Conferences every year from the mid-60s through the early '70s, and I never saw anyone wear spruce green shorts. They may have been in the catalog, but I never saw them and nobody wore them. PGNormand (talk) 16:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explorers never had spruce green shorts, but they did have spruce green pants, as well as long and short sleeve shirts and the flat cap. See [1]. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk -

Okay. Then you agree with me. So why does the article indicate that the reason Explorers wore olive green shorts was because "only the [spruce green] shirt was available"? My Explorer Post never "developed its own uniform" (which is simply code for "stopped wearing the uniform"). And, the reason that we wore olive green shorts with the spruce green shirt was because that WAS the official uniform, not because the BSA stopped making something else. PGNormand (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Distinctive Dress Identity came along later in Exploring, and was mainly for career-oriented Explorers, and is the norm in Exploring today.[2] --—— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk - 18:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Camping Coup

One of the more significant recognitions I recall from my days of scouting was the earning of camping coup--different colors for significance earned for camping, canoeing, jamboree participation, etc. I know that Mic-o-say and OA also have a coup system. Seems like this article could be enhanced by the inclusion of a coup system discussion section. I personally do not have enough qualification to add such a section with proper reference otherwise I would.P Todd (talk) 19:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your post is the first I've ever heard of a coup system in 61 years of scouting so I really can't comment or help. North8000 (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

News to me, at least under that name. --evrik ^(talk) 21:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]