Talk:Undetectable Firearms Act

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article title

Hi there! I noticed that the title of this article had recently been changed to remove the year. I wanted to bring that up and see if anyone else thinks that should be reverted. The United States Government Printing Office's official copy of the final bill reads in section 1 "This Act may be cited as the 'Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988'." Other bills, like the one that was passed by the House a few days ago, also refer to it by including the year. (See this). What do other people think? Thanks. HistoricMN44 (talk) 15:31, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think per WP:COMMONNAME the shorter name makes more sense, but I suppose either way there would be a redirect so no strong opinion. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:54, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair. I guess I tend to prefer precision, in part because our government seems to like to use the same name (or nearly identical names) over and over again. I did a search at govtrack.us and got these results. There is an "Undetectable Firearms Act of 2013" pending in DC local government, plus a few similarly named ones that include the word "Modernization". I guess with redirects it doesn't matter too much. I am going to change the name in the article text though. Thanks. HistoricMN44 (talk) 16:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Undetectable Firearms Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]