Jump to content

Talk:Underwater search and recovery

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information on professional S&R needed

[edit]

Recreational S&R is a very small, almost trivial, part of S&R. Some indication of the scope of technology is needed. Cheers, Peter (Southwood) (talk): 15:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B-Class review

[edit]

B
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.

  2. References needed. ☒N
  3. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.

  4. Lead mentions other methods of S&R which are not addressed in the text. Expand. ☒N
  5. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.

  6. Structure OK but will have to be expanded with additional content. checkY
  7. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.

  8. Looks OK at this stage. checkY
  9. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.

  10. Reasonably illustrated, but room for improvement./ checkY
  11. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.

  12. Looks OK at this point.checkY

Needs to be expanded considerably to include non-diver S&R.• • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 16:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]