Talk:Underwater acoustic communication

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Acoustics Taskforce.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Underwater diving Low‑importance

	Underwater diving portal This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Underwater divingWikipedia:WikiProject Underwater divingTemplate:WikiProject Underwater divingUnderwater diving articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

range?

I was curious as to the range of this technology. And, maybe, bandwidth. I realize the answer is probably 'it depends'. But just some ballpark numbers would be really interesting... can you send voice communications 100 feet? 1000 feet? 10 or 100 miles? I have no idea and the article gives no clues, other than that diagram of a sub and a ship. OK so we know it probably works over 100 or 1000 feet. Example (i'm making this up cuz I dont' know):

The biggest factor in quality of transmission is the water current present at the time. During WW2, the JX99, a US navy sonar system between ships and subs, could carry 2-way voice communication 2000 to 3000 meters if the current was under 5 knots. Above 30 knots, distance was reduced to 250 meters, and above 50 knots, no communication was possible.

More recently, multi-transducer systems have allowed voice channels up to 10,000 meters, or 300kbps telemetry 2000 meters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OsamaBinLogin (talk • contribs) 21:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ranges of 8 to 10 kms have been practically achieved and such systems are in use. the systems are designed fore more ranges but practically ranges above 8kms are rarely achieved--- girish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.54.188.44 (talk) 17:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vixar2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Vixar2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Vixar2.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.njit.edu/~abdi/PID478552.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 01:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Quiet consensus assumed. Result:Merge. Alan Islas (talk) 13:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge Underwater telephone into Underwater acoustic communication. I think that the content in the Underwater telephone article can be better explained within the larger context of Underwater acoustic communication. Underwater telephone is a very short stub and can be easily incorporated here. As a stand-alone article it struggles to meet notability and has other issues as well. Alan Islas (talk) 13:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.