This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
Comment: Specifically, see WP:NOTHOWTO. As well, the Procedure section contains quite the use of the word "we", which does not conform to WP:TONE. Not to mention that it is a step by step instruction (hence WP:NOTHOWTO). You may also wish to explain why the test should be conducted according to IS13311-1992, as well as briefly explain what IS13311-1992 is (though I recognise that you include it in a reference), and how this would impact the test and/or its results. As well, the ref tags should be spaced so that the directly support the content from them. Also, try to make sure that there is not more than one link per ref tag, as this makes it easier to determine what is proven by what source. Ref tags should not close out paragraphs, they should close out sentences. Thank you, -- OrduinDiscuss21:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This may be a notable test, but we'll need to see some reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail, so we know that it's not just original research. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, /wia/talk20:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]