Talk:Ultra Violet & Black Scorpion

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disney+ Release

Bringing this discussion here.... The first 10 episodes have been released on Disney+ and it's going to be weeks/months before some of them air on Disney Channel. Since this is an official release and not just a VOD preview release, I believe we should recognize the episodes and their Disney+ release dates here. As for sourcing, we could use DMED articles (like this or any of those "What's New on Disney+ in June 2022" articles... like we do with most streaming originals. Is there any opposition? I'm hoping we can reach a consensus because this is going to keep happening with more Disney Branded TV shows, including The Villains of Valley View next Wednesday. cc: @Amaury:, @IJBall:, @BrickMaster02:, @Geraldo Perez:, @MPFitz1968:, @Magitroopa:. Thanks — Starforce¹³ 21:01, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind including the Disney+ thing in the article in the article, but it should be done right, without messing other things up. For example, the first 10 episodes of the series were released on Disney+ on June 8, 2022. (If that date is correct. I don't trust random IPs.) That can be added as prose in the Production section. Amaury • 21:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that should be added as prose. But what should we do in the "list of episodes" table? Should we do it like Secrets of Sulphur Springs where we had an efn in the OriginalAirDate column... and then added the actual date later when after airing on Disney Channel? — Starforce¹³ 21:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the series logo

CLOSED

Nothing more to do here. Amaury • 00:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@Amaury: I don't think you understand a thing about how Commons works. Wikimedia Commmons' project scope page states the following:

Wikimedia Commons is a media file repository making available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content (images, sound and video clips) to all. It acts as a common repository for all Wikimedia projects, but the content can be used by anyone, anywhere, for any purpose.

The italicized text emphasizes that files from Commons can be used anywhere, even other Wikimedia projects. As a result, thousands of Commons files are used on various Wikimedia projects, and numerous pages about TV shows use logos of said TV shows that are ineligible for copyright due to them having a simple design. In fact, text from Commons is published under free licenses: all structured data from the file namespace is available under the All structured data from the file namespace is available under the Creative Commons CC0 License, whereas all unstructured text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. For more information about Creative Commons and its licenses, click here.

Speaking of being ineligible for copyright, the logo for Ultra Violet & Black Scorpion is ineligible for copyright protection due to it only consisting of simple text. Therefore, it is able to be used for any purpose, though it is still protected by trademark laws, therefore restricting its usage.

I was just trying to sort things out, but you still acted your way and did not even try to assume good faith. It's pathetic how you've been editing Wikipedia for more than 10 years, yet you don't know this stuff. Also, I am not an alt of JohnCWiesenthal, I am a separate entity from him. I should probably create an account to prevent any more misunderstandings. 212.117.1.186 (talk) 21:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I have reverted your meaningless edits. Files from Commons are and will always be free, they are not bound by traditional copyright. Thank you. 212.117.1.186 (talk) 22:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.P.S. One more thing I would like to mention is that the logo for Ultra Violet & Black Scorpion is actually property of Disney, not Commons. Hope you understand. 212.117.1.186 (talk) 22:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that I do not operate 212.117.1.186's account. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done - The logo is back on the page. Told you I didn't do anything wrong, and neither did John. 212.117.1.186 (talk) 23:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The logo is back on the page because I discussed it with an editor I trust, not some random IP who's been blocked for vandalism and abusing multiple accounts. Amaury • 00:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.