Talk:Uckfield College

This article was nominated for deletion on January 26. The result of the discussion was Keep.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Mid‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment as of March 2007

Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, as requested, I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of Start on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Mid on this importance scale.

My reasoning is as follows: This article needs more information and should be organized into sections. It also needs pictures Adam McCormick 04:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Value of certain Content

Is there really any need to tell people the current principal is Hugh Henerby? And that he replaced craig pamphilon. Also do we really need to include a paragraph saying the college has many qualified teachers and a variety of departments. I think most people would realise that a college is going to have this, it comes across as advertising. Also would it be possible at some point to tidy the article up and put it into categories? I welcome anyone's views on this.03jmgibbens (talk) 09:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of staff are unencyclopaedic, unmaintainable and easily resolved by supplying a link to the College staff page. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Education for some general guidance. The Principal might be reasonably argued to be notable, this ought to be supported by an independent reliable source, for example a newspaper article about the school and its current Principal rather than just the College website. Categories and other improvements can be flagged but the vast majority of institution articles are poor quality and unmaintained. Fæ (talk) 09:38, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of names

Lists of names in this article should be sourced in accordance with WP:BLP. As there is no way of constantly maintaining linked articles, this applies to names which have a Wikipedia article as well as those that do not. Any name listed with no verifiable citations should be removed. Refer to WP:NLIST for guidance. Fæ (talk) 09:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]