This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
As the article says, New Ironsides was "the last and largest of an initial group of three ... ironclads". The other two experimental ships were USS Galena and, most successful of the three, John Ericsson's USS Monitor. Only Monitor was repeated. Neither New Ironsides nor Galena had any sisters afloat. Angus McLellan(Talk)00:37, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article on the David suggest that the damage from the spar torpedo was significant. I suspect in view of massive nature of Ironsides hull that this article is correct but is there more info available? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.203.255.2 (talk) 12:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm away from my sources, but I don't think that there's any additional info available. The most telling fact about any damage, IMO, is that the ship remained on station for a while longer, which implies that the damage was relatively minor.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Caledonian Mercury of 22 August 1863 states that a ship was sunk trying to leave Charleston on 1 August with the loss of all hands. Is the vessel's identity known? Mjroots (talk) 07:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]