This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This vessel is a fairly good illustration of the problem with so many minor and obscure vessels where the official, public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships (DANFS) has essentially been paraphrased as the entire Wikipedia article. With the blanket "This article includes text from the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships" note what fact statements are and are not DANFS can quickly become confused with any additions. Furthermore, some ships have more non-Navy history than Navy that is covered in DANFS. These particular ships were built and operated as U.S. Army Mine Planter Service vessels and could be covered under those names. For practical reasons, including the fact most people think all military vessels are "USS," I concur most main pieces should remain under the Navy name with redirects from another. In this case, Army history is about equivalent to Navy and both less lengthy than as a commercial fishing vessel. To solve the DANFS "problem" I consolidated the very brief DANFS information into a single paragraph with specific DANFS cites for data explicitly extracted from that work. Palmeira (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
