Talk:USCGC Fir (WLM-212)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USCGC Fir (WLM-212) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

National Register of Historic Places C‑class High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).

Location

Unclear where the Fir is located. Has been listed within List of National Historic Landmarks in New York, but NHL nomination study states Fir is in operation off Washington and Oregon states.doncram 05:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was eventually identified definitively to be in California, article updated, NHL lists updated. doncram (talk) 17:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Damage control party at work, I reckon.Tjlynnjr (talk) 05:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Major edit

Major edit in progress. Please help me with layout. I have all the straight dope. Thanks.Tjlynnjr (talk) 07:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference link number 7, 1st part is defective. Reference link number 11 is not Fir.Tjlynnjr (talk) 10:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery

The gallery section has grown out of control in this article. I went through all of the pictures yesterday, added an appropriate category to them in Commons, added a Commons Cat template, and then trimmed the less encyclopedic images. I also captioned the remaining images. I did all of this so the article follows WP:Galleries.

Another editor came along and reverted the edits, so now we enter the WP:BRD cycle. I am not convinced how this collection of images: 1). Adds to the reader's overall understanding of the article. and 2). That several of the images are themselves not of a quality to be encyclopedic. Many lack context, and none of them are captioned.

I would appreciate feedback as we seek consensus to move forward. Cheers. EricSerge (talk) 13:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concur. Don't need the clutter of so many images. I've reverted once again to restore all of proper changes lost when Editor Jefflayton reverted my last edit. I've made further changes and improvements and changed the gallery to use the {{gallery}} template where I've included {{commons category-inline}} as a footer. That should be sufficient. Editor Jefflayton: leave it alone.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 13:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know the owner of Fir (Curt Lind) and the person responsible (Thomas Young) for upkeep, restoration, maintenance, etc. They are fine with the images. In fact, the Fir and the pier 38 legal battle are about to get a lot of media attention soon - so the more on the wikipedia page, the better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A free people ought...to be armed (talk • contribs) 15:27, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved Editor A free people ought...to be armed's post to the bottom of this topic in keeping with Wikipedia talk page common convention.

The issue isn't whether or not Fir's owner and maintainer a are "fine with the images". The issue is the article's compliance with Wikipedia's gallery guideline. Both Editor EricSerge and I have asserted that the inclusion of so many images does not comply with the guideline. I, for one, do not find the possibility of media attention a sufficiently convincing argument to warrant disregard of the guideline.

All of the images are available through the {{commonscat}} links that both Editor EricSerge and I added to the article.

Editor A free people ought...to be armed's most recent revert should be reverted.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 16:00, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per our discussion here and the brief discussion at User talk:Jefflayton, I have scaled back the gallery. If Fir is invloved in a legal battle, then once this is found in a reliable source, independent of the subject, then I welcome that addition to the page. In the meantime it should be remembered that Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. If you want to improve the article, find more reliable sources to improve coverage. Cheers. EricSerge (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Guys. Sorry again as I have never used wiki, but am learning. Also, thanks for putting a link to the photos. Can we reference the "motherfir" website I included since it was done by the owner? — Preceding unsigned comment added by A free people ought...to be armed (talk • contribs) 17:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]