Talk:UEFA coefficient

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Highlighting top 2 teams in men's coefficient table

Currently, the men's club coefficient table shows the highest coefficient for each season in bold. Would it be worth also highlighting the number 2 coefficient for each season, since that association will earn an extra berth in the Champions League? Perhaps highlighting #2 using something other than bold (maybe bold italics). I realize one can just sort the table and see who the top 2 are. But then again, the same can be done to identify the team with the highest coefficient and yet we still have that number in bold. Also, if there's a tie for #2, sorting wouldn't necessarily take tie-breakers into account. I think highlighting #2 in some way would make this information easier to find. Bmf 051 (talk) 21:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that the association coefficient that gives those 2 spots, not the club coefficient? Either way, each league only gets 4 Champions League spots (+ potentially the previous seasons Championship and Europa League winners). I don't see that it's worth trying to indicate which stage teams qualify to; as there's many more beyond this. Also I think note 'b' already covers this. Nfitz (talk) 18:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Er no, from next season, two leagues will get an extra spot for up to five in total. T v x1 09:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

4-year Club coefficient

I don't know why we (and UEFA) still report the 5-year Club coefficient when (as far as I know) it has no bearing on anything. Yet the 4-year Club coefficient is now used for determining the qualification to the Club World Cup - and it's not documented anywhere in Wikipedia (I can't even find a good external source for it - though I haven't been too thorough on that). Nfitz (talk) 18:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article explains carefully what it’s used for! T v x1 00:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @Tvx1 I completely forgot about the seeding. Massive brain fart there! But the article says it IS being used for the Club World Cup - and I'm scratching my head for what - I thought they were only using a 4-year coefficient, not a 5-year one. Nfitz (talk) 00:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article is difficult to navigate on mobile

Is the a way to make this article collapsible? JBrown95 (talk) 16:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should be specific. What does "make this article collapsible" mean? How are you viewing it? What problem are you trying to solve? When I view it on desktop, the menu is always available on the left, and it seems relatively easy to navigate. Greenman (talk) 19:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so the problem might just be on mobile/tablet.

I'm not sure how to best explain it. So bear with me.

So when you go on to other articles you can tap on the headings to reveal that section of the article and then you can tap it again to hide it.

On this article the whole page is just one long scroll, with no ability to show/hide different sections.

Making navigation not great JBrown95 (talk) 11:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did notice how difficult it is to read on mobile the other day. But I don't use mobile enough to know why. Chrome on Android - same result in Incognito mode.Nfitz (talk) 11:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

seems to be specific to this article. A different article, say FIFA Men's World Ranking seems to be able to do the collapsing on mobile Assassin (talk) 11:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another article not working is 2023 Major League Soccer season. I wonder if a template or map is broken. Nfitz (talk) 18:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

suggestion about a new map

it would be better if someone can make a new map which contains countries that at least one team reaches to group stage of any uefa club competion. (includes champions league , europa league and conference) 176.40.246.182 (talk) 21:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]