Talk:U.S. Route 250

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

U.S. Roads: U.S. Highways Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. Highways
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article does not require a junction list.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Untitled

This section appears to be based upon a biased opinion on what this road should be and not what it is. The "Overall Description" section listing blow-by-blow every junction is quite difficult to read. If it is felt that this information is necessary, perhaps it could be illustrated with a map? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluekat12 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Overall Description section has been removed. It is highly debatable whether any other comments were based on biased opinion, but all comments have been removed. Cites have been provided for future upgrade plans. Brian Powell (talk) 05:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lanes

Though I admittedly skimmed the first couple of sections, I didn't notice any discussion of whether these sections had single or double lanes. Would be helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.238.109.204 (talk) 15:17, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Route 250 in Ohio

With all this material for Ohio, I'm amazed that nobody has considered splitting off U.S. Route 250 in Ohio onto a separate article. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 12:35, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on U.S. Route 250. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050215130553/http://dot.state.oh.us:80/trac/99Tier1.htm to http://www.dot.state.oh.us/trac/99Tier1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganize from east to west

European-American historical development ran mostly east to west - from VA to WVA and OH, not the other way around. The earliest settlements and roads were in the east; Ohio development was later, and the earliest development started around the Ohio River. Why does this article start with a description of the route from Sandusky and then east to VA? It doesn't make any sense and should be reorganized.Parkwells (talk) 02:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]