Talk:U.S. Commission on the Ukraine Famine

Ukraine Low‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: History Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Out of 200 testimonies, 130 were anonymous?

Very fair and balanced. Grr, evil commies, grr.

-G —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.246.112.186 (talk) 00:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coatracking template

This label has been applied to a template (possibly incorrectly)- however no case has been made on template talk page. Bobanni (talk) 13:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent blanking

Dear editors I kindly ask you to read several pages of Congress report to find out what actually appeared at it and what are not. Link provided at the bottom of the page for your convenience. WP should reflect the way how “findings” were obtained – otherwise it’s info will put visitors in misconception – you know – lie by omission.Jo0doe (talk) 07:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What you are advocating here is original research which is not allowed in Wikipedia. The text you add is your own selective commentary of each of the conclusions. Please read WP:V, any unsouced text can be challenged and removed. Please find a reliable source that discusses those points you wish to insert and we can verify. Martintg (talk) 18:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The text removed appeared at Commission report (use google)- given by direct citation or as summary. Please read report before make any accusation in OR. Thank you. Link to online version of report provided at the bottom of the page for your convenience.Jo0doe (talk) 10:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]