Talk:Twitter bomb
A fact from Twitter bomb appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 May 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Addition of Several Categories
[edit]I plan to separate this article into sections labeled "Politics" (how Twitter bombs have developed from and affected politics), "Similarity to Spamming", "Criticism", and "Positive Impacts." The last two sections are meant to line the article up with Wikipedia's pillar on neutrality, representing different major points of view about the same subject. Each new section will also be expanded beyond what is written in the existing page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommy-tang-seattle (talk • contribs) 03:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Rename to X bomb? Please discuss
[edit]This was suggested (well, done) by @Gahex220 and challenged in the edit summary by @Klrclds. Since there is no consensus for move, and I also find Klrclds's argument compelling, please use WP:RM procedure. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- PS. Many instances of Twitter were changed to X. I am not sure if we should be doing this for historical contexts. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- i guess people dont call it "x bomb" Gahex220 (talk) 01:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Gahex220 In that case, can you undo your changes in text and restore the term 'Twitter bomb'? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- someone has already done that Gahex220 (talk) 15:18, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Gahex220 In that case, can you undo your changes in text and restore the term 'Twitter bomb'? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- i guess people dont call it "x bomb" Gahex220 (talk) 01:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)