Talk:Twin Groves Wind Farm

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment: Sustainability Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

Nice

Nice to see this created. I will go over it and do some formatting later tonight. I will set up the references as inline citations and give it a copy edit too. Nice job Stang.--IvoShandor (talk) 04:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I added the revenue portion tonight as well so you may have to read over it. And as far as where i needed citations, I had them in there earlie, I must not have saved that particular draft. But I reinserted them and everything should be single and sometimes double cited. From what I have found on Wiki, this might be the best Wind Farm article I could find, save for your of course Ivo. I will also work on getting better pics, I took these on day while driving home. so they are too bad i didnt think. Stangboy7 (talk) 05:11, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bias?

The revenue portion seems more like an advertisement for the wind farm than an objective article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.172.23 (talk) 20:30, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this wind farm abandoned?

I've driven past it on I-74 on numerous occasions and have seen only a couple of turbines with the blades actually turning. Many towers do not even have operable red safety lights currently. Most have the blades parked and are unlit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.182.39 (talk) 19:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Twin Groves Wind Farm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090524193305/http://www.wind-watch.org:80/news/2007/05/30/twin-groves-wind-farm-may-add-170-towers/ to http://www.wind-watch.org/news/2007/05/30/twin-groves-wind-farm-may-add-170-towers/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:14, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]