Jump to content

Talk:Twice a Man (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Schwede66 talk 23:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Hinnk (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 40 past nominations.

hinnk (talk) 07:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi hinnk, review follows: article created 2 July and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to what look to be reliable sources for the subject; that it was Dukakis's first film is mentioned in the article and checks out to the source cited; that it was an avant-garde film is mentioned in the article but not explicitly cited, I am happy with this given the sources used ("Home Movies of the Avant-Garde" "...The American Avant-Garde"); I don't have access to the offline sources but found no issues with overly close paraphrasing from the online sources. Just awaiting a QPQ and I think this will be good to go - Dumelow (talk) 08:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    QPQ at Template:Did you know nominations/Lady Tacos de Canasta. Agree that it's unlikely anyone would suggest Twice a Man isn't an experimental film, but to be on the safe side, Sitney's Visionary Film: The American Avant-Garde, 1943–2000 does explicitly make that connection (it's the last sentence in the Themes section). hinnk (talk) 19:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, hinnk. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 15:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]