Talk:Tuʻi Tonga

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tonga (assessed as Mid-importance).

Requested move 18 May 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. The nominator changed their mind, leaving the consensus against moving, on the basis that the character is not a proper apostrophe. — Amakuru (talk) 10:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tuʻi Tonga → Tu'i Tonga – Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Typographic conformity specifies that apostrophes should be straight, not curly or slanted. Is this character an apostrophe, or is it a special character used in Tongan orthography? Verbcatcher (talk) 02:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Unless anyone can show that the unusual punctuation has particular significance to the title, I support the move for conformity. —A L T E R C A R I ✍ 03:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The fakauʻa is not an apostrophe and it should be written with Unicode U+02BB ʻ MODIFIER LETTER TURNED COMMA and not with the single quote or quote open (See fakauʻa and Tongan alphabet for details and cf. Nukuʻalofa, Māʻuluʻulu). — AjaxSmack 01:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. On this basis I favour retaining the existing name. Should the apostrophes in Tongan words in the article be replaced, such as in "Tu'i Ha'atakalaua". Does Tongan use the apostrophe and the fakauʻa? Verbcatcher (talk) 14:53, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think all of the fakauʻas are already correctly rendered in this article. In some fonts, they may appear very similar to apostrophes. The glottal stop (/ʔ/) should always be represented by the fakauʻa and not the apostrophe. — AjaxSmack 21:49, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - The characters appear very similar, but if you search for an apostrophe (or a fakauʻa) then you can distinguish them. This works in the Chrome and Edge web browsers. There are some rogue apostrophes in item 24 which I will attempt to fix. Even if they look the same here, the font used by Wikipedia may change and the text may be used elsewhere. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:09, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.