Talk:Trusteer

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computer Security: Computing Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Phishing#Technical responses|anti-phishing]] The anchor (#Technical responses) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

This is notable software. My bank offers me to use it. If anything I'd like more info here on what the software does. Genjix (talk) 09:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is "trivial" supposed to mean here? Is it "easy" (ie bad) or "unproblematic" (ie good)? Another word needed. Diomedea Exulans (talk) 12:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How it should be restructured

It warrants a link from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keystroke_logging#Countermeasures - I suspect a new subsection needs to be created there. That is where the techniques used by this software should be described (generically).

Trusteer seem to have a monopoly on this type of software. Is this the case? Dorcots (talk) 10:37, 25 April 2010 (UTCc

citizens bank out of boston, mass seems to be offering this now.

Blatant Advertising

I will request deletion on my next visit, if there doesn't appear to be notable reason for it to be here.

Information from the domain record suggests the article lacks verifiable references. Content lacks any notability and appears to be an advertisement for a product. Claims made by the company are questioned by other AV companies and by security professionals.

Claims made by the vendor about the product have not been verified.

Kernel.package (talk) 08:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When my online bank offered me this, I found this article very useful, especially in pointing me to the articles describing the triviality of bypassing the keylogger protection, as well as the problems with uninstallation, etc. I'd suggest keeping the article for other users who will probably have the same questions, but remove any unsourced claims, or state that "the company says that it protects against keylogging; however, (this source) reports that they were able to bypass this alleged protection easily" etc.

In other words, make it a NPOV balanced presentation, in which unsourced company claims are clearly identified as such (or removed), and the countervailing evidence from reliable sources is presented in the same paragraph. This would remove the advertising-like nature of the article, and provide true encyclopedic info for readers. Unimaginative Username (talk) 23:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BSOD Allegation

I've removed the BSOD allegations since they weren't in the reference given (they were contained in a comment at the bottom of the article, but I don't think that really qualifies as a reliable source...). If you have a decent source for such allegations feel free to add them back... GoddersUK (talk) 01:17, 16 November 2012 (UTC) I'm not a regular Wikipedia editor, but can't pass this one: Yes, Trusteer causes BSOD, but without any trace, so it is impossible to pin it to Trusteer and call them for support. Resolved only by process of elimination, by removing one program at a time. Piece of s... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.158.33.22 (talk) 19:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Company Design Ethics

I've removed the following text because it had no source or citation:

"The software is designed similar to a virus or malware that the company says they protect the user from. The in-ability to remove it from a system that it has been installed to is a hallmark of malware that this software contains. The program hooks into various Windows API's and hijacks your browser in the name of security, but it has been proven trivial to circumvent." If a reliable source can be found then the claim may be re-added. Tullifer (talk) 12:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Define: Rootkit :facepalm: 2600:100C:B215:1A05:65E5:275E:7BCD:841F (talk) 08:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change in EULA

"In addition, You authorize personnel of IBM, as Your Sponsoring Enterprise's data processor, to use the Program remotely to collect any files or other information from your computer that IBM security experts suspect may be related to malware or other malicious activity, or that may be associated with general Program malfunction."[1][2] 109.193.68.118 (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Trusteer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.trusteer.com/support/supported-platforms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Overly promotional rewrite reverted

I have reverted a complete rewrite of this article which took place in June last year. Both the style of content and the username of the editor (MorElgazyIBM) are strongly suggestive of editing by the company to manage their image.

I would urge any employee or representative of Trusteer or IBM who wishes to improve this article to read Wikipedia's policies on Conflicts of Interest and the general principles of Neutral Point of View and What Wikipedia is Not. - IMSoP (talk) 21:10, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Biased source?

"Trusteer rebuffs bank security bypass claims" (citation 47) There was a followup given at 44Con that probably relevant. 2600:100C:B215:1A05:65E5:275E:7BCD:841F (talk) 08:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]