Talk:Trumpeter (company)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Reviews of Trumpeter Products

I tried to add some sources and moved some down into footnotes. I removed the link to the review of the CV-8 Hornet, since it is no longer accessible. I also removed the general link regarding the withdraval of the F4F prior to its release and added a reference to the official statement of the importer. I removed the quote from the Hyperscale discussion board, since it was not linked and I thought that the officla statement is a better source. To balance out, I added the review of the retooled kit and the Me 262.

Independent, sourced reviews of Trumpeter model kits are available at several web site and other publications including Perth Military Modeling site, AMPS (amps-armor.org), Hyperscale, Armorama, and others. The kits I listed have been rated highly.

Kindly do not remove references to these reviews and their conclusions, 217.85.192.23. These are sources, not personal opinions. If you have other sourced content to add, by all means please feel free. DMorpheus (talk) 20:18, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your refs are a tad dubious. Try a site that is large and well organized, such as Scalemates. The article has too much unjustified criticism about a product and little real info, and so it is not in line with WP policies. When was Trumpeter created? What is their % of the market? Exports to? The article reads like an Airfix fanboy bagging the opposition.220.244.236.132 (talk) 23:37, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganized 12-27

I created new sections to divide the armor model content from the ship content; other sections can be added as needed. Restored cited armor review content reverted 4 times by 217.85.192.23 in violation of wikipedia 3RR rule. Hopefully the creation of the new sections can allow for each editor to get the results they are seeking. DMorpheus (talk) 13:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice approach and certainly the first productive idea in the discussion. That meets my proposal. The new article draws a picture much more fitting, and that is what I expect of wikipedia. Sorry but obviously without that "violation" no positive result could be achieved. Hope experts in the aviation and naval modeling field will fill the gap. In order not to "violate" again any "opinion, judgement, knowledge strictly forbidden" rule, I will not contribute further to this article. 217.85.209.216 (talk) 14:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, assumption of good faith would have gone a long way towards achieving this result faster. Bye. DMorpheus (talk) 14:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]