Jump to content

Talk:True North (Once Upon a Time)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTrue North (Once Upon a Time) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 31, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 29, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Emma Caulfield (pictured) was cast in a Once Upon a Time episode because the producers "couldn't think of anyone better to trap two children in a house and try to eat them"?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:True North (Once Upon a Time)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 17:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Oh, hey, Krycek.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    "in a parallel with the story of Hansel and Gretel (Lord/Collins)" -> I'd say it's already implied that the kids fit these roles, so I'd drop the bracketed bit here.
    "who invites him to hang out." -> seems a little informal.
    " [in 'The Price of Gold']" -> both source and MOS use double quote marks ("The Price of God"), so stick with that.
    "as Young Peter Bishop and Young Olivia Dunham" -> "as younger versions of Peter Bishop and Olivia Dunham"
    "It earned a 3.3/8 among adults between the ages of 18 and 49," -> include a link to Nielsen rating and explain what the numbers mean (% of sets in use/total population)
    "'ong enough to watch 'True North.'"" -> dropping the single quotes and adding italics would be an acceptable typographical change.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    Grand
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    Although it does seem complicated, I'm wondering if the plot section is a little long.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Yep
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Fine
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Images are grand.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Not a lot of work to be done here, on hold for seven days. GRAPPLE X 20:17, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I know the plot is a bit long, but I can't really find anything useless to trim, as this is one of those series that usually has every little detail possessing some level of significance. Otherwise I believe I've addressed your concerns (italicized True North and tweaked the prose). Thanks, as always, for reviewing! Wow, that man certainly knows his science fiction...! Ruby 2010/2013 04:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fairy muff then, happy enough to pass this one. Well done! If you haven't checked him out yet, do so. GRAPPLE X 04:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on True North (Once Upon a Time). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]