Talk:Tripropellant rocket
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
More Sources for the article
[edit]NASA has some research available in public domain about tripropellants. For example http://archive.org/details/nasa_techdoc_19700018655 is a paper about lithium-fluorine-hydrogen engine design.130.234.5.138 (talk) 21:47, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Introduces Two Kinds, Discusses Only One
[edit]The German Wikipedia web page only talks about the other kind of Tri-propellant system, the one with metals added. This one has nothing about the metals other than saying that it exists. Please add the missing section. Also, one form that the German page doesn't mention is Aluminium flakes "floating" about within the kerosene tank. I remember this - chemically, it's tripropellant, but without a separate storage container. 4.154.250.8 (talk) 20:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tripropellant rocket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100210203238/http://www.astronautix.com/engines/rd701.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/engines/rd701.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)