This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Well, the city of Toledo has a number of place names containing "Fort Industry" and the article claims it was a temporary stockade at the mouth of Swan Creek on the Maumee River, citing this source. However, the source does more to establish the lack of any authoritative knowledge of the actual location than to definitively locate it. Miami of the lake as mentioned in the treaty was an earlier name for the Maumee River, but says nothing about where on the river. older ≠ wiser21:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can't we say we don't know where on the river, but we're pretty sure is was on that river? Most of the sources say it was. The innuendo is bigger than the fact. Isn't that a legend? I've searched thru the War Department documents of that era, and sure enough, I can't find such a fort, though there is an intriguing reference to a fort at "head of the Maumee" (not named). Sbalfour (talk) 22:56, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
