Talk:Treadwell gold mine

Alaska Mid‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 May 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Dear editors, please fix this, as it's already been tagged as an autobiography at WP:COI. Please fix it soon, or, I'll tag it as COI, POV, and non-notable. Good luck! Bearian 19:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's also been tagged for deletion, as it lacks any sources whatsoever. Carajou 13:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to withdraw the tag, as others have begun to add pertinent source material. Carajou 15:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Source links

The source links had an excess slash at the end, which is why they were broken. Additional sources were easily found via a google search. DES ^(talk) 15:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to what I've seen in many pages, Wikipedia has rules for citing sources properly within the body of the text, and since the two links near the bottom went nowhere (at the time, before the discovery of the extra slash) in addition to that, the whole was tagged for deletion...but that of course changed due to some good editors making positive contributions. Carajou 17:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note to prospective editors

I think that this GoogleBook could be of use in our efforts to expand the article, saving the link here for now. - Icewedge (talk) 00:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]