Talk:Travis Ludlow
Travis Ludlow has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 14, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Travis Ludlow article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Travis Ludlow appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 February 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- ... that Travis Ludlow broke the world record for the youngest person to fly solo around the world? Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-57641567
Created by Sahaib3005 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC).
- The article was nominated on the same day it was moved to mainspace, so is new enough. At ~3000 characters, it is long enough and properly uses in-line citations. The hook is short enough, interesting, and is cited in-line. The QPQ is done. Looks good to go! SilverserenC 22:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Travis Ludlow/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 11:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, using the template below. —Ganesha811 (talk) 11:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Sahaib: the GA review has turned up noticeable copyright violations (see below). If these are not promptly fixed (say, within 24 hours) this will be a quickfail per the GA criteria.
- @Ganesha811:, I fixed it yesterday. Sahaib (talk) 13:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, looks like the issue is addressed. I'll continue with the rest of the review. —Ganesha811 (talk) 13:24, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Apologies for the slow review, I am dealing with covid at the moment and will return to this in the next few days. —Ganesha811 (talk) 13:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sahaib, the review is about done. Just let me know if creating a map of Ludlow's route is something you want to do; if not, no worries, it won't prevent this article from reaching GA. —Ganesha811 (talk) 12:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ganesha811, a couple of months I tried making a map (File:Map of Travis Ludlow's flight.jpg) but it wasn’t that good. I might attempt to make a map again in the future or maybe someone else will as I have added the Map needed template to the talk page. Anyway, thanks for reviewing this article. 🙂 Sahaib (talk) 16:09, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sahaib, the review is about done. Just let me know if creating a map of Ludlow's route is something you want to do; if not, no worries, it won't prevent this article from reaching GA. —Ganesha811 (talk) 12:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Apologies for the slow review, I am dealing with covid at the moment and will return to this in the next few days. —Ganesha811 (talk) 13:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, looks like the issue is addressed. I'll continue with the rest of the review. —Ganesha811 (talk) 13:24, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Ganesha811:, I fixed it yesterday. Sahaib (talk) 13:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Understandable. If you ever make a better one, add it! In the meantime, this article passes GA. I should say, though; another reviewer might have just quickfailed it on the copyright issues. That's was a big problem, and though you fixed it quickly, in the future, make absolutely sure your articles are free of copyvio before nominating them for GA. For now, though, congrats to you and anyone else who worked on it! —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
These issues must be fixed promptly or this will be a quickfail. —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Biography articles of living people
- GA-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class aviation articles
- GA-Class aerospace biography articles
- Aerospace biography task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- GA-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia Did you know articles