Talk:Traveller's cheque

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Numismatics Low‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Usability: do banks in the USA accept TC? is there a commission? -- Afsfa (talk) 08:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Waitperson"? Surely "waiter" is the more commonly accepted term?

Amex (not) first to develop traveler's cheques?

The current article says: "The largest volume issuer of traveller's cheques is American Express, the first to develop the product in the late 19th century." But the page for January 1 lists "1772 - The first traveller's cheques, which can be used in 90 European cities, go on sale in London for the first time." Only one of these statements can be correct, and I don't know which one. Probably, Amex was not the first to develop them after all? — David Norris 01:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The tale is relayed in American Express of J. C. Fargo's difficulty obtaining cash on a letter of credit in the late 19th c. If the 1772 launch was a successful enterprise and TCs still existed at that time, the market niche would not have been available for Amex to service. But I'll try to incorporate this discrepancy in the article. knoodelhed 04:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On a related note, when I deleted the claim that Thomas Cook developed traveler's cheques, I stated in the edit summary that my reference was the Thomas Cook AG (former) article. I can't change an edit summary, but the statement about when they entered the business is actually in the Thomas Cook article (though it shouldn't be since it's about the company; that article is supposed to be about its founder and namesake). Of course, I left the 1772 statement in there although nearly all reliable sources attribute its invention to American Express. --RBBrittain 03:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Cook first issued traveler's-cheques (although not under that name) in 1874. There's a lot of European institutions that were issuing TC's before Amex's launch in 1891. Amex may have caught a niche in the US, but that wasn't universal. Thomas Cook's TC's were pretty dominant in the UK, for example. Mauls (talk) 00:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usability

The article doesn't indicate some common difficulties in using TCs. For example, in a number of countries (e.g., Mexico, France) it is virtually impossible to use them except by cashing them at a bank. In Russia (St. Petersburg), I was unable to cash TCs at banks (I didn't even try stores), only one (Sperbank) of the ten or more we tried even admitted to even theortically cashing them. On three different days in the summer of 2007, the bank said that they would have to have authorization from Moscow (for even one one-hundred dollar TC), which they said they couldn't contact. Kdammers 08:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I work at a retail store in the United States, and we stopped accepting traveler's cheques because over 50% of the checks we recieved were fakes. Many other stores are doing the same now, and it is becoming difficult to spend them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.199.12 (talk) 20:34, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Colombia no stores accept travaler's checks and a few years ago in the Valle del Cauca only ONE branch of ONE bank, the Banco Industrial Colombiano (the branch in Cali) was willing to cash them. Alloco1 (talk) 01:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cross AE/BE?

Why does this article use the American spelling of "traveler/traveller" but the British spelling of "check/cheque"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.177.31.33 (talk) 05:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Compromise? SergioGeorgini (talk) 20:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe because that's the way American Express has spelled it? Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 11:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nota?

Section under Usage uses the term "nota." This use of word does not appear to be found in the English Wikipedia or Wiktionary. Can someone clarify what that is? Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 11:47, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the word "nota" has been replaced with "receipt" in subsequent revisions. Thanks. Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 19:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference 1 is a broken link.

Link of reference #1 is broken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.52.38.223 (talk) 09:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference 1 is a broken link. Baziliscus (talk) 20:32, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling inconsistency

Surely it's either "traveller's cheque", correct English, or "traveler's check", American English? It seems oddly inconsistent to have this half and half mixture of both. Gymnophoria (talk) 16:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It should be one or the other, and since the title is British English, I am going to tag it as such, and do my best to change the article that way. --Dthomsen8 (talk) 03:22, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Traveler's cheque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081015161253/http://archive.thisislancashire.co.uk:80/2005/1/3/452155.html to http://archive.thisislancashire.co.uk/2005/1/3/452155.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect spelling change

@IVORK: I think you mistakenly went the other way with your recent change: the US spelling is traveler, while the international spelling is traveller (as per the title). Getsnoopy (talk) 07:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯— IVORK _Talk 06:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@IVORK: All good. Could you please revert your changes? It says a clean revert is not possible. Getsnoopy (talk) 05:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]