This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This map points up one of the fallacies involved in using jurisdictional maps for geographic features; geographic features are defined by geographic maps of geographic features; and when something is located on the boundary, a bi-jurisdictional map is needed, as here; some other pages, i.e. of BC-Alberta peaks, have BC maps, and both are wrong; there should be a Map of the Canadian Rockies, maybe a satellite or a graphic rendering, for such peaks; with provincial boundaries but not limited to one province/state; I don't have a pushpin one handy - nobody seems to have the time to make an ortho-rectilinear or whatever the type of projection map is that pushpins work on, i.e. for geographic/topographic features....guess I'll take this to WP:Maps, but all these should be addressed; ditto those on the BC-Alaska/Alaska-YT boundary....Skookum1 (talk) 20:57, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Could you provide a more concise summary of what the problem is? This is listed for RfC, but I don't really see what we are supposed to be commenting on? DigitalC (talk) 05:01, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
