Talk:Trapped in the Closet (South Park)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trapped in the Closet (South Park) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Trapped in the Closet (South Park) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 15, 2008. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WP:URFA/2020 notes
[edit]As part of the ongoing drive to reevaluate old FAs according to modern norms, I took at look at this article, and have some comments on issues I think stand in the way of it being a featured-quality article:
- The article seems very unbalanced in terms of what it covers. I get that the controversy around scientology was a big part of the discussion around the episode, but the "controversy" section both seems like a bad place to cover a lot of it (it's weird Hayes' departure gets mentioned after the discussion in production about why they chose to do the episode and its direct relevance) and also feels like it really could use a pass for summary style (some of the information is plain trivia, like "hey they referenced this in a cover illustration years after the fact" at the end. Why does a joke at Tom Cruise's sexuality merit a four-sentence quote from Entertainment Weekly with no followup? etc.) From an organization perspective, a lot of the stuff is better put in development, release, etc, instead of a "controversy" section.
- The reception section seems pretty spare. There's very little actual critical reception from publications at the time, the analysis section doesn't actually say much at present, and the legacy section is mostly just a rebranded "in popular culture" trivia section. From a quick search of academic databases and Google Books, there's newer scholarship that should be reflected in the article (e.g., ; the article at present basically doesn't cover anything in the last decade-plus.
- File:South Park Xenu.jpg needs a better fair use rationale, and I don't think there's much justification for File:Cmonjews.jpg and especially File:South Park Scientology grafitti.jpg; they're not the subject of critical commentary and they're mostly illustrative.
--Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- @David Fuchs: I see that the article has not had significant edits since you posted this review above. Do you still agree with the assessment above, and if so would you be willing to nominate this to WP:FAR? Z1720 (talk) 23:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'll probably get to it early next year. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 13:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia former featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class Animation articles
- Mid-importance Animation articles
- C-Class Animation articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class American animation articles
- Low-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- C-Class Animated television articles
- Low-importance Animated television articles
- Animated television work group articles
- C-Class Computer animation articles
- Unknown-importance Computer animation articles
- Computer animation work group articles
- C-Class South Park articles
- High-importance South Park articles
- South Park task force articles
- Animation articles used on portals
- WikiProject Animation articles
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- C-Class Los Angeles articles
- Unknown-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class Comedy articles
- Mid-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- C-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- C-Class New religious movements articles
- Mid-importance New religious movements articles
- New religious movements articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- C-Class Scientology articles
- Low-importance Scientology articles
- WikiProject Scientology articles
- C-Class television articles
- Mid-importance television articles
- C-Class Episode coverage articles
- High-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Unknown-importance American animation articles
- C-Class American television articles
- Unknown-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- C-Class Colorado articles
- Unknown-importance Colorado articles
- WikiProject Colorado articles
- WikiProject United States articles