Talk:Transparify

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Transparify article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Transparify. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Transparify at the Reference desk.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Transparify be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Updating

if someone could kindly update, we'd be much obliged. I think we meet notability criteria, with extensive press coverage from NYT, FT, to many others, see our webpage. As I myself am working with Transparify, it would not be ideal if I edit (though arguably a factual update would still be OK). Hundnase (talk) 11:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone please update this page to cover the IODC rating and the 2016 report (see "publications" page on the www.Transparify.org website ? I think we again meet notability criteria, with extensive press coverage worldwide, see the Transparify homepage for links. I work with Transparify so I'd prefer not to do it myself. Till Bruckner (talk) 16:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Links

as I work at Transparify, I am wondering whether others can add these links/info, and I keep them deliberately generic so that an editor can take this further:

Transparify argues that media should highlight when policy experts do not disclose their affiliation.^[1]

(Hundnase (talk) 05:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC))[reply]

References

^ Sullivan, Margaret (20 September 2014). "Hidden Interests, Closer to Home: New York Times Public Editor on Conflicts of Interest". New York Times. Retrieved 2 October 2014.

[NYT_HiddenInterests-1] Sullivan, Margaret (20 September 2014). "Hidden Interests, Closer to Home: New York Times Public Editor on Conflicts of Interest". New York Times. Retrieved 2 October 2014.

[1]