User talk:Till Bruckner

Welcome

Hello, Till Bruckner, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:41, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

PhD thesis

Please do not use your PhD thesis as a reference unless you can show it has been reviewed by third-party published reliable sources. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:44, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NeilN, thanks for the feedback. I'm new to Wikipedia so please clarify. Wikipedia guidance states:

Completed dissertations or theses written as part of the requirements for a PhD, and which are publicly available (most via interlibrary loan or from Proquest), can be used but care should be exercised, as they are often, in part, primary sources.... If possible, use theses that have been cited in the literature; supervised by recognized specialists in the field; or reviewed by third parties.

1. My thesis has been published in book form by a reputed academic publisher, Lambert Academic Publishing: http://www.amazon.com/Aid-without-Accountability-billion-sometimes/dp/3659257052

2. It has was supervised by reputed experts. The Politics department at Bristol has the UK's top (5*) RAE research rating. It was also peer reviewed (viva) by two scholars working at UK universities.

3. It has been externally (and approvingly) reviewed by a well-known expert in the field: http://www.bourgoing.com/en/2014/04/does-aid-transparency-accountability-effectiveness-not-so-sure/

I thought it would be more appropriate to reference the PhD thesis than the (identical in content) published book, as it seemed more within the spirit of Wikipedia to refer readers to a source that is freely accessible online, and that in turn contains hundreds of further references to reputable sources. Also, citing the thesis avoids the impression that I am trying to market my book via Wikipedia.

Please advise how to proceed in future. Thanks!

Till Bruckner (talk) 15:15, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LAP Lambert seems to work using a self-publishing model so your thesis is a self-published source. The key is "use theses that have been cited in the literature". Your point #3 helps - do you have more examples? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:46, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Only this review, by a noted Georgia expert (and fellow PhD holder): http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R286OVEPO141C1/

Otherwise, numerous Transparency International Georgia (very reputable org) publications that I authored and on which the thesis heavily draws, look under "TIG" in the bibliography, and various other publications on the subject by myself: https://www.scribd.com/doc/78025140/Publications-on-Aid-Accountability-by-Till-Bruckner

Finally, check out the bibliography of the thesis, it's tightly referenced to hundreds of reputable sources. I prefer citing the thesis rather than the individual papers it draws on as I think that it provides the most comprehensive starting point for readers who want to dive deeper into the subject. Also, I've also considered "Uni of Bristol" to be seal of academic quality.

OK or not to cite it? You have the last word. RSVP.

Looking forward, on specialist niche subjects, can I cite quality journalism of my own that is published by reputable outlets? Examples: https://www.devex.com/news/the-paradox-of-aid-to-resource-rich-countries-85964 https://www.devex.com/news/megabucks-for-megawatts-how-morocco-sold-donors-on-its-billion-dollar-solar-gamble-86131

I'm a researcher and journalist so when I learn about something, I usually also publish on it. RSVP II.

Thanks for your time! I'm new to this :))

Till Bruckner (talk) 16:37, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may run into editors that think you're running afoul of our conflict of interest guidelines. The accepted practice when using material you authored is to propose the change on the article's talk page and see what others say. If you do this, let me know and I will try to help out. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:23, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks!

Content and citations

You've probably noticed by now, how it takes some time to learn what type of content is acceptable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Separately, to make meaningful contributions, you should follow citation style, as described at Template:Citation. Good luck! —RCraig09 (talk) 01:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Till Bruckner (talk) 20:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]