Talk:Transfer orbit

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rocketry Low‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is "Suprasynchronous transfer orbit" correct?

The "Suprasynchronous transfer orbit" line links here - to a paragraph that refers to a supersynchronous (not suprasynchrorous) transfer orbit. Googling "suprasynchronous transfer orbit" produces no results - other than this Wikipedia disambiguation page, and copies of it. Should it be changed to "Supersynchronous transfer orbit" instead (and perhaps also linked to Supersynchronous orbit, rather than to the TESS page)? Ross Finlayson (talk) 14:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Hohmann transfer orbits

I've worked out the math for non-Hohmann transfer orbits having one endpoint, departure or arrival, at one of the transfer orbit's apsides. (Hohmann transfer orbits have both endpoints of the intended trajectory coinciding with a transfer orbit apside.) You can find the exposition as the featured post on the MeWe group for Mathematical Astronomy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.15.29.82 (talk) 15:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]