Talk:Toy Biz, Inc. v. United States

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Untitled

I don't know if anyone is interested, but there was a discussion about whether the Supreme Court would uphold the sorts of actions taken in X-Men 3, and I responded by citing this case. The whole conversation is pretty funny, if you ask me. Dave (talk) 06:58, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, yeah. Thanks for sharing. —Nightst a llion (?) 09:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last link in References ("Is Wolverine human? A judge answers no") is broken. --70.231.227.194 23:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course they are not human.

They diverged from Homo sapiens,retaining humanoid appearance.(Homo sapiens superior according to Xmen) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.228.243.145 (talk) 22:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Actually, that's not true. Homo sapiens sapiens is a subspecies, not a species. Homo sapiens idaltu, Homo sapiens sapiens, and Homo sapiens superior are all subspecies of the same species. In addition, the term "human" can be used for any species in the genus Homo. If they were Homo superior, you might have a stronger point. 75.118.170.35 (talk) 19:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Popular culture

This article reminds me of various age-old jokes where an enthusiast must defend his hobby by arguing that he isn't playing with dolls ("They aren't dolls, they're action figures!.. something along those lines). Does this, or could this, relate in any way? Even if it could only be related in a humorous mention, I think it would be a neat tie-in for the article, assuming I'm remembering it right. *Vendetta* _{(whois talk edits)} 07:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]