Jump to content

Talk:Towson United Methodist Church

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleTowson United Methodist Church was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 25, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
February 14, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
May 22, 2008Good article nomineeListed
November 14, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
February 17, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 14, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Towson (Md.) Methodist Church's membership split in two for 90 years after a dispute over the American Civil War?
Current status: Delisted good article

Organ and carillon

[edit]

I have placed this in a separate subsection with its own title, as we have enough content to do so and the section now has as much information about organists as well as the initial construction of the organ. Thus, rather than being in Building and facilities, I've moved it to this subsection for better flow. If anyone disagrees, please explain why here so we can discuss further. JGHowes talk - 14:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Towson United Methodist Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Delisted. Real4jyy (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too much uncited content. The original GA nominator has unfortunately passed so I don't think updates are forthcoming. Schierbecker (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see about 7 {{cn}} tags, generally for minor details, but otherwise the prose looks generally cited...footnote for nearly every sentence or related 2–3 sentences in nearly every paragraph and often multiple such. Could you clarify the scope of your concern? DMacks (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.