This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
No evidence the building was listed. The thesis, concerning the nomination of the building, states the owners didn't want it listed because they felt restrictions out-weigh benefits. Otr500 (talk) 05:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Although it seems clear the "Tower Theatre" is "considered a landmark" (per the Library of Congress, Sports Illustrated, and other sources) it has so for escaped being listed on any of the historical lists (that I could find) that include the NRHP, National Historic Landmarks in California, California Points of Historical Interest, or the Sacramento Register of Historic and Cultural Resources. I could not verify the source used in the opening sentence, nor could I find that the building is listed in any "official" publications, so the lead information either needs changing to reflect is "considered" a Sacramento, California landmark, a verifiable link found and used, or removed.