Jump to content

Talk:Top Cow Productions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:The Darkness 07 (Art by Marc Silvestri).jpg

[edit]

Image:The Darkness 07 (Art by Marc Silvestri).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Top Cow Productions logo.jpg

[edit]

Image:Top Cow Productions logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Freshmen.jpg

[edit]

Image:Freshmen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pilot Season merge

[edit]
  • Keep There has been a lot of attention on this "banner" title and it will make a solid standalone article. (Emperor (talk) 15:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]
  • I'm against the merge, as the "Pilot Season" thing has enough info and distinctiveness that it would just be clutter in this article. Ford MF (talk) 16:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge. (I originally proposed it.) I'm not sure that "Pilot Season" is notable enough on its own, but it would clearly work in the main article, though it could likely be trimmed down a bit. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • The problem is we have only just got started (it has only been a handful of hours since it was started, after all) - there is the reception (reviews, sales figures and the large number of votes) as well as the fact that the latest round doesn't include existing titles. It is also worth noting that Pilot Season is effectively a banner title under which the one-shots appear, so we can partly consider them as mini-series - this is underlined by the fact that the first round are being collected into a trade paperback volume. So rather than trimming it down it actually need expanding. (Emperor (talk) 21:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]
    • Fair enough. Let's see how things progress, and we'll revisit the merging issue, if necessary. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Top Cow Productions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"House style" claim

[edit]

@Trizhia13 Is there any particular reason you removed the Comic Watch reference for the claim that Top Cow was known for its house style? I don't think it proves the claim that Top Cow had a house style is true but it helps prove that there was a perception that it had a house style. Klintron23 (talk) 15:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi all, There were WAYYY too many external links on this page and most of them looked like they'd be more appropriate as references (and maybe even useful for the content of the article, especially sincee there's a flag template on it for needing more references). I removed the external links but didn't have time to go through them for use as supporting material for the article (i.e. didn't have time to convert them into references), so I'm putting them here for future use (by myself or anyone else)!


--KRKwrites (talk) 05:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Top_Cow_Productions&oldid=1233945882"