Talk:TootsieToy

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 22:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

TootsieToy → Tootsietoy – The name Tootsietoy, without the second capitalized 'T' was used at the very beginning of the company, I believe, but the all lower case form of the name is more representative of the company appellation throughout the decades. I perused Google Images searching several pages down with "Tootsietoy logo", "Tootsietoy label" and "Tootsietoy package". Not one instance was found of "TootsieToy" (with the second capital 'T'. The name appears two different ways on packaging: 1) All caps (TOOTSIETOY), or 2) With first letter capitalized (Tootsietoy). The latter should be the name of the page according to custom Relisted. BDD (talk) 19:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC) --Cstevencampbell (talk) 00:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Possible Name Change

I still support the name change the name of this article from TootsieToy to Tootsietoy as per the above reasoning and invite others to support here - so the proposal can be submitted again.--Cstevencampbell (talk) 00:30, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this page not use <ref>s?

Most articles use standard referencing wiki markup. Why does this article have to be different? I see no justification here. David Spector (talk) 19:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree. The entire References” section could be eliminated if the inline cites were like the common usage of citing that is prevalent currently. THX1136 (talk) 23:59, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]