Talk:Tony Slydini

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Magic Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagicWikipedia:WikiProject MagicTemplate:WikiProject MagicMagic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV tag added

I agree with everything written here, which is why I think this man deserves more serious description.
The writing overall shows admiration for him, but that can interfere with NPOV. Some of the gushing praise is followed by references, but is still opinion. A few examples: “Slydini would go on to appear on The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson and other popular broadcast venues of his time, but this was not his forte.” “His subtle magical gestures made it clear that he knew something not known, and probably unknowable, to his audience. Audiences saw an elfin quality in him that was unlikely to be duplicated.” “His almost casual manner of performing made the magical effects he offered those of true magic.”

Again, I don't disagree with any of these things, but they do not read like an encyclopedia article. --Badmuthahubbard (talk) 22:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Page Edits Needed

Hi, everybody. I wonder how long it will take for my message here to receive a reply. I have a habit of ending up on and editing pages of minor celebrities of history (perhaps that is a good habit, since these are, in my opinion, more often than not in dire need of repair), and, with all due respect to the great Slydini (whom, I admit, I had never heard of before today), he may fall into this category, so I don't know how many Wiki-users frequent this page...!

Anyhow, down to business. First, there was a red image tag at the bottom, which simply read File:Slydini.jpg. I have removed it, as the image was missing. If anyone knows what this was, please add it back in - the more pictures the better, within reason, in an article of this caliber.

Next, I noticed this sentence: "In 1945, in New Orleans Slydini showed his own special brand of magic." First, this is vague. Although there were some little bits of information following this statement, we are not told what exactly Slydini's style WAS. Also, the wording is a bit confused - did he just perform in that style for the night, all of 1945, or the rest of his career? It does not sound like the latter, but I believe that is what was intended. Perhaps we should instead say "In New Orleans in 1945, Slydini introduced the style of magic that he would perform for the rest of his career. I'm not going to make the change; as I admitted before, I wouldn't know Slydini from a bowling pin, so somebody with some more knowledge, please do.

Finally, where the heck is the vast majority of his life? Is there no information about the 50 YEARS between the statement about 1945 and his death? That seems unlikely to me. I think I will do some studying into his career and see what I can find to add, but, regardless, this article needs some serious beefin'!

Thanks for reading my book here. I didn't intend for this to be so long, but hey, I tried to be concise. Thanks + Cheers - "Yes...It's Raining" 02:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And - thanks for all of the comments regarding the article - I agree with them all and then some. This is the first time I've seen the article and it is indeed skimpy. Too bad given that Slydini was truly one of "Magic's" grand masters, authoring a number of best sellers (now collector's editions) within the Magic Fraternity. His name came up some time back when I was authoring a biographical article on someone who knew him well. It will take some time but I will re-contact him and locate some information on his life and career. When I do, I'll work on this piece.

One of the remarkable things about Wikipedia is that it catches those who were great during their lifetime but like all who pass away, are quickly forgotten afterwards. Slydini is indeed one of those people. Thanks again for bringing this to our attention! Sinclairindex (talk) 15:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's done. Thanks again for the note. Given that this magician is credited with changing an entire field of prestidigitation and is continually being honored today, you were correct in your assumptions. I hope that this does the job. I am sure that others will be able to do even better going forward.

Year of death

Dick Cavett's blog entry "Conjuring Slydini (Part 2)" at nytimes.com says he died in 1999, the article says 1991. --Smithfarm (talk) 13:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This should be corrected now. His record of death coincided with the International Brotherhood of Magician's obituary so it's reflected in the article. Slydini was coming up on 90 years of age when he died and has sometimes been reported as being 90 so I suspect that is where the confusion came from.

year of birth

I just came across a page of the MagicPedia where it says he was born on September 1st 1901. In the wiki article its 1900, so wich one is true? Here is the link: http://geniimagazine.com/magicpedia/Slydini 93.208.72.191 (talk) 18:40, 30 October 2010 (UTC) IP[reply]

It is September 1, 1901. When I was researching this I did find several magazine references that placed his birth in 1900 however, the larger "magic" publications and his newspaper obituary placed his birth in September of 1901. This was also backed up by the larger publications in the magic field (The Linking Ring, MUM, Genii), etc.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tony Slydini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100917020211/http://www.magiccastle.com/ama/awards/index.cfm to http://www.magiccastle.com/ama/awards/index.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]