Talk:Tongwynlais

Cardiff Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cardiff, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cardiff-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CardiffWikipedia:WikiProject CardiffTemplate:WikiProject CardiffCardiff articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Time to semi-protect?

With the recent repetitive peacocking this article is getting - and getting rid of - it may be time to semi-protect it. This would force the editor adding the peacock terms to log in. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 23:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, its getting very tedious removing the unsupported propoganda and I half suspect a sock puppet but have not had time to look into it yet. --Snowded (talk) 23:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just changed the poulation. It was changed even though it uses the 2001 census as a reference. Also the distances to Cardiff, pontypridd and Caerphilly were completely wrong so I have corrected those as well. harris 578 (talk) 19:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also I agree that this should be semi protected ASAP. harris 578 (talk) 19:51, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To ask for semi-protection, read Wikipedia:Protection policy then decide if semi- or full-protection is in order. If it's an edit war such as arguing over whether a given fact belongs or whether a given un-cited fact should be flagged citation needed or summarily removed, then full protection is in order. If it's vandalism such as repeatedly inserting known-false facts or repeatedly inserting opinions disguised as facts without attribution, then semi-protection is in order.

Before asking for protection, consider asking for a third opinion or engaging in wikipedia dispute resolution. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Temperature Chart

I may have been a bit hasty in removing the temperature chart. I should have given the editor more chance to improve it. The temps need sorting. The reference needs fixing as it is for Edinburgh. Also can it be made smaller as it takes up 1/4 of the article when it really isn't that important a thing for a village to have a big temp chart. If it was on the Wales page fair enough. Thatsitivehadenough (talk) 17:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]