Talk:Tokai Park

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 27 April 2017 by reviewer Dodger67 (talk · contribs).

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment from draft's creator re: removal of copyrighted material

This work is our own and written by us, therefore not a copyright violation -though it looks that way. The author is the same. We will remove and modify the history section. Is this what the problem was and why the article was rejected? User:Arebelo 22:11, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is my work. I have added the cc-by-sa 4.0 to the original iNaturalist site (https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/tokai-arboretum/journal/15730-tokai-national-arboretum), deleted a copy on iSpot. The copy at https://yellow.place/en/friends-of-tokai-park-cape-town-southafrica was originally from iSpot, which will be now iNaturalist, but I cannot edit it. The original publication of this article was from the Newsletter of the Friends of Tokai Park - the Tokai Manner 1, which I wrote as an encyclopaedic account of the area in 2010. Tony Rebelo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.21.170.5 (talk) 10:24, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We have tried to fix the issue with the copyright by following Wikipedia's instructions (adding cc-by-sa 4.0 on our original text -see above). Can you please help us have this page reinstated? Arebelo (talk) 11:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I might be able to help with this. · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 08:19, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article on iNaturalist has been licensed CC-by-sa 3.0, so is now fully compatible with Wikipedia licensing. · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 07:29, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citations requested

Arebelo, I have tagged a number of statements - Paragraphs and sentences - for referencing to reliable sources. I do not think they are inaccurate or contentious, but given the article's history, I think that it would be prudent to nail down all the loose edges and make it watertight. Ping me when this is done, I have no doubt it is possible, but it may take a while if you are busy. When done I will review for B-class, as I think it is in reach. · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 09:30, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(for reference a link to the archiving action and the archived discussion) · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 10:45, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

B-Class review

B	The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as `{{cite web}}` is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. Done The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. Done The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. Done The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. Done The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible. Done

Mostly needs more detailed referencing. · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 11:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]