Talk:Title of honor

Requested move 5 March 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 12:34, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Title of honor → Title of honour – Please see consensus of the article honour on Wikipedia. Chicbyaccident (talk) 11:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per ~~MOS:RETAIN~~Wikipedia:TITLEVAR; this article's title was written in American English and there is no reason to change it to British. Ppp ery 14:44, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:RETAIN does not apply to article titles. The relevant policy is WP:TITLEVAR, which is very clear on this matter. It says that varieties of English in article titles should not be changed across the encylopaedia have an artificial consistency. I.e., having color gel and colour state is acceptable and sensible. Therefore, I must oppose this proposal. RGloucester — ☎ 16:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – This looks like unnecessary MOS:ENGVAR churning. I also don't see what "consensus of the article honour on Wikipedia" the nominator is referring to. Is this saying there was a move from honor to honour, or just that the honour article uses internally consistent spelling? —BarrelProof (talk) 04:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Revert of redirect

I have reverted the redirect to Title#Types because:

There was no consensus to do so, and
This article should be merged into the section of the target

Senator2029 “Talk” 12:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comments

Greetings to all,

A Request for comment has been initiated regarding RfC about whether to allow use of honorofic 'Allama' with the names or not?

Requesting your comments to formalize the relevant policy @ Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles

Thanks

Bookku (talk) 17:58, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List cleanup

The list of honorary titles seems to have picked up a few occupational names, such as Police Chief and Fire Chief. I'd argue that job titles are not honorary, but merely discriptive--condsider Physician vs. Fellow of the American College of Surgeons. Any opposition? Tadzweil (talk) 03:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]