Talk:Timothy Duke
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Esq.St.J.?
[edit]Has Mr Duke really been an Esquire of the Venerable Order of St John since 1988? The way I understand it, an appointment like that usually lasts for three years. Has a Gazette entry been missed somewhere?--dave-- 04:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- I did wonder about that myself. I have anyway remove the post noms which are for order not general usage. Alci12 18:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
HOW OLD?
[edit]According to the infobox, he is older than the man he replaced and older than the retiring age. As well as, the two ages do not agree - is he 76 years old or 63? Kiltpin (talk) 20:40, 5 July 2014 (UTC)