Talk:Timeline of the STS-51-L mission

Spaceflight List‑class High‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
List	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rocketry

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP:NOT Censored

I noticed that one of the entries on the timeline is "(Expletive) hot!". Seeing as Wikipedia is not censored, shouldn't the quote be present in its full, original form. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 19:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's censored in the original NASA transcript, so, alas, I don't have a source to fill in the missing word. Colds7ream 20:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Just wanted to say that the timeline is looking really good. I did wonder though, why you had decided not to include dialogue from Mission Control as part of it. I think that having that dialogue, especially post-accident, really adds something to understanding how the chain of events unfolded. MLilburne 08:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, its because I couldn't find it - if you know where I could get a copy of that transcript, i'd be delighted to add it in. Thanks for the compliment, by the way! Colds7ream 08:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Spaceflight Now transcript is probably the best source. I can see that there might be some difficulty fitting the timestamps all in the right places because some of the segments of dialogue go on for a while, but I'm sure there's some way to get around that.

I probably could have phrased the compliment even more strongly than I did. This is the most useful Challenger timeline I've seen available, and a really great complement to the main article. So yeah, keep up the good work! MLilburne 08:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]