Talk:Timbral listening

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Timbral listening article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Electronic music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Music theory

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

help with clarifying

any clues and feedback as to what is confusing about the article would be helpful and much appreciated. Cotton32 (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything at all confusing or unclear here, so have remove the tag. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neologism

The deletion of an article you created, Timbral Listening, has been proposed for the following reason: Neologism with no asserted usage.

in reference to this - please see published references and further reading at the bottom of the article which use the term 'timbral listening'. Is this really a Neologism? or is there another one in the article? This is my first article and I have read all the help pages and tutorials but perhaps I am missing something? Any help would be much appreciated. Cotton32 (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

stub

in reference to this article being a stub and not containing enough information - extra information is being added over the next few days so please bear with me! Cotton32 (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, it's surely no longer a very short article and it provides context, which is why speedy deletion was declined. It might be challenged again in the future, though, on grounds of WP:NOTABILITY, to be either merged into Timbre or deleted. --Amalthea^Talk 17:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]