User talk:Cotton32

Proposed deletion of "Timbral Listening"

The deletion of an article you created, Timbral Listening, has been proposed for the following reason:

Neologism with no asserted usage.

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:41, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Timbral Listening

A tag has been placed on Timbral Listening requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 19:45, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Timbral Listening

A tag has been placed on Timbral Listening requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KurtRaschke (talk) 00:39, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SNL Pro (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SNL Pro.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SNL Pro

Hello Cotton32. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "SNL Pro".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SNL Pro}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:34, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement

I can see that you are an occasional editor, but you need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Molly Macindoe. The material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth - I did not copy and paste this article. I am the writer of this article and it is my original work as are the many other articles I have written about this photographer and the hours and hours of research I have done on the subject. I have included quotes with references which can be found elsewhere on the net - these have been referenced as per wiki formats and guidelines. You should know as a frequent editor that quotes are allowed when referenced properly and not subject to copyright. 'Right to quote or right of quotation or quotation right is one of the copyright exceptions provided..' This is from wiki guidelines. This copyright infringement is a false accusation and an insult to my hard work and I request you remove it immediately. User:Cotton32

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Cotton32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 103.205.175.123. Place any further information here. Cotton32 (talk) 12:37, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

It appears that this was a compromised host back in 2018. I can't see any current evidence of that. I've unblocked that IP. SQL ^{Query me!} 14:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]