Talk:Tick, Tick, Tick (film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tick, Tick, Tick (film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

On 15 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Tick, Tick, Tick. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 3 December 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 02:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...tick...tick...tick... → Tick, Tick, Tick (film) – Per WP:MOSCT and WP:MOSTM. Not without precedent per [1]. --wooden superman 15:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and also books In ictu oculi (talk) 10:23, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Since it is listed as Tick, Tick, Tick that in the books and in the Allmovie link. As stated above this keeps it inline with naming WP:MOS conventions. JC7V (talk) 04:45, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
C Abstain I would like to see more evidence for either rendition.--Sıgehelmus✨ (Tålk) 03:59, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 15 October 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 23:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– The only other uses of this title are television episodes, one of which is a redirect. Among all the uses, this seems to be the primary topic. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 22:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added move of associated dab. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Shwcz (talk) 05:51, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Film has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 22:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: to generate a more thorough consensus — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 22:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose surprisingly - less viewed than two TV episode articles, and with the Indian fims occasionally Tick Tick Tick in web content then the blue line trailing along the bottom of the pageviews inidcates that this obscure 1970 film is not primary of anything and should quite arguably be at Tick, Tick, Tick (1970 film) In ictu oculi (talk) 07:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per In ictu oculi. There are six entries listed upon the Tick, Tick, Tick disambiguation page, with no indication that the 1970 film holds such a high place in film history that it dwarfs the combined notability of the remaining five entries. It should be also noted that, among the sources (AllMovie, the Fredric March biography) mentioned in the above Talk:Tick, Tick, Tick (film)#Requested move 3 December 2018 which resulted in the main title header being moved from ...tick...tick...tick... → Tick, Tick, Tick (film), neither depicts any commas in the film title, while AFI Catalog, TV Guide, TCM, the poster appended to the infobox as well as the film's own on-screen credits, all render the title as Tick...Tick...Tick... —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 16:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the episode 374 views compared with 477 for the film and the title of the episode includes unusual details thus per WP:SMALLDETAILS the title without them is the title more readers will likely use. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:39, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.