Talk:Tibbers Castle

Tibbers Castle has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 25, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scottish Castles

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Castles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Castles in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish CastlesWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish CastlesTemplate:WikiProject Scottish CastlesScottish Castle articles
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New draft

Hello, I've prepared an re-draft of this article at User:Richard Nevell/sandbox. Since it mentions work of the Castle Studies Trust and I'm on the charity's board I would appreciate it if someone could have a look and check that the balance is ok. Then if everyone's happy I'd like to copy the contents over to this article. Richard Nevell (talk) 21:03, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Horis: @Rosser1954: @QuintusPetillius: @Rod Oliphant: @What Are The Civilian Applications?: @Hchc2009: Hi folks, I'm pinging you because you're either listed as a participant at the Scottish Castles WikiProject, are actively editing in the area, or actively edit articles about castles. Would you be happy with me transferring over the draft of the article as I've outlined above? Richard Nevell (talk) 21:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For reference: opinions on the redraft here and here. Richard Nevell (talk) 19:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tibbers Castle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 06:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well constructed, will get back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 06:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Section 1

Para 1; sentence 2; Use past tense of the word "record" i.e "recorded". Comma(,) after Sir Richard Siward must be removed. Because it completely disrupts the sentence meaning.
Para 1; last sentence; Add a comma(,) after "In 1302".
Para 2; In the sentence "...rs to George Crichton, Lord High Admiral of Scotland and later 1st ....". Add "to the" after "later".

Para 2: Capitalize "i" at the start of second sentence.

Section 2

No issues in this section.

Lead

In last sentence change the tense to "took place" instead of "have taken", because the years of happening were mentioned.

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 09:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All good suggestions, done so far. Richard Nevell (talk) 11:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a couple of edits. Good to go.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:21, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the article! Richard Nevell (talk) 12:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]