This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternate History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Alternate HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Alternate HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Alternate HistoryAlternate History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
BookWorld was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 10 January 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Thursday Next. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article needs a complete rewrite. Nearly every word of it is just describing the plot and the alternate universe, there is nothing about how the books were received by the public or anything else relating to reality. Large sections of it could probably just be removed and it's appalling that an article this long that has been on-wiki for such a long time only has four sources and one of them is just Google maps. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any way of listing something in Wikipedia as "not proven but probably true"? I refer to the use of Google Maps as a source. The only thing I see wrong with it is that Swindon BC could possibly have some other reason for thus naming their streets. Possible, since coincidences happen, but not very likely. Odd also that very nearby there is a Hardy Close joining with Egdon Close.
But yes, something conclusive from Swindon BC on the matter would be better. Unless Next fans prefer living with uncertainty! Richonthegade (talk) 12:31, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
