This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
Hi Chugga/67.163.90.107
I removed the gallery again. Please don't just undo changes without at least explaining them in the edit summary.
The four pictures are very blurry and they don't add to the article, in my opinion. The station can already be seen in the infobox in higher quality. Do you disagree, and if so, what can be seen on those 4 pictures that is of encyclopaedic value?
--Amalthea (talk) 14:32, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I recently changed the name of the "Traffic" section to "Ridership". I thought that was a better representation of the section. Anyways, my main concern is that image of Amtrak train 51 arriving at Thurmond. The image must go on the left because of this page's infobox, but I don't like how the image causes the title (and only the title) of the History section to be awkwardly bumped to the middle of the page. I think the formatting should be changed to avoid this. I have come up with two possible solutions: (1) the image could be made smaller or (2) an extra line break could be added to the ridership section. Alternatively, more information could be added to the lead section or Ridership section. I, unfortunately, can't think of anything else to add. I would like to hear your thought. Does anyone object to changing this, have a preference for one of my suggestions, or have a better idea? MasonJar55 (talk) 07:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
