Talk:Three Treasures (Taoism)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taoism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaoismWikipedia:WikiProject TaoismTemplate:WikiProject TaoismTaoism articles

Philosophy: Ethics / Religion / Eastern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Philosophy of religion
	Eastern philosophy

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I think it might be a good idea to cite which translation is used for the quote in the beginning, since I've noticed that different authors sometimes prefer to use/avoid different words when writing inexact translations. This would help maintain consistency for anyone who has read several translations.--Tonberry King 05:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

very wrong

misinformation i think. this is not the three treasures.

is this article real.

                     nshan13

Revision

Since the original version of this article was unfortunately based on Mitchell's "patience" translation, I've done a major revision. If anyone is interested, please add more translations to the table.

Keahapana 02:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't be discussed

This should not be discussed as it is sacred and can only be when in a Taoist temple with certain requirements. All are welcome to find this knowledge, simply visit a Taoist temple and ask the people there. Tkms Dailly Rubbings 12:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Mitchell

I received an email from Nemome suggesting to "forget Mitchell" and the previous edit noted "changed order of Mitchell's 3 treasures - Mitchell doesn't transliterate, so the order he places in English is not the same as their order in the original chinese." It's more accurate to say Mitchell doesn't translate, so I'll delete his interpretation from the table. Keahapana 00:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2007. I've re-removed the Mitchell reference in the article because Mitchell famously does not know any Chinese, did not translate any Chinese terms, and only interpreted other people's translations (see here: http://scott.london/interviews/mitchell.html). Mitchell is very popular, but the relevant section is for "translations", and a creative interpretation by a poet who knows no Chinese is not reliable or even a translation at all. My wikipedia skills are garbage, but I highly recommend replacing it with Ames' and Hall's translation, due to the fact that it is much more reliable as a source of Sinology, and the fact that the goal of the translation was philosophical fidelity, including in the commentary, at the expense of being atrocious to read for pleasure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGreatConsultingDetective (talk • contribs) 04:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference citation format

Hi Cybercobra, thanks for your good job cleaning up the table. However, you've also started changing the reference format from existing inline parenthetical to footnote, resulting in a jumble of both systems. I'm familiar with the arguments for and against the different referencing systems, and understand that everyone has their personal preferences. WP:CITECONSENSUS advises, "Because templates can be contentious, editors should not change an article with a distinctive citation format to another without gaining consensus. Where no agreement can be reached, defer to the style used by the first major contributor." I suggest we revert to the existing Harvard style referencing. What do you think? Keahapana (talk) 23:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The table is very useful

The table is very very good and helpful, since no one cares to say 'thanks' nowadays I say thank you Cybercobra.

Sanmayce (talk) 04:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Three Treasures (Taoism). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]